Identification

Title

Soil near-surface properties, vegetation observations, land use and land management information for 1800 locations across the Thames catchment, UK, 2018-2021

Abstract

[This dataset is embargoed until August 31, 2024]. This dataset contains information about soil near-surface physical and hydrological properties, vegetation observations and land use & management information across the Thames catchment (UK). It was collected during the ‘Landwise’ project’s ‘Broad-scale field survey’ which sampled 1836 location points across a total of 164 fields/land parcels. The aim of the survey was to quantify the impact of innovative land use and management on soil properties, with implications for natural flood management. The surveyed fields were selected to represent four broad land use and management classes (arable with and without grass in rotation, permanent grassland and broadleaf woodland) and five generalised soil/geology classes. Approximately eight fields were sampled for each of the twenty combinations of land use and soil/geology class. The sampled fields cover a range of traditional and innovative agricultural practices. Within each field/parcel, representative sampling locations were selected to cover the anticipated range of soil variability, including typical infield, untrafficked margins and trafficked headlands/tramlines etc. Sampling was undertaken once during the period 2018-2021. Samples were measured and analysed using a range of field and laboratory techniques (see Data Lineage). Point data include: 1. Survey point location (British National Grid coordinates) 2. Soil quantitative measurements (near-surface: 0 – 50 mm below ground level): dry bulk density, volumetric water content, organic matter, derived porosity, derived porosity accounting for variable organic matter, particle size distribution and texture classification 3. Vegetation quantitative measurements: maximum and minimum height 4. Soil qualitative measurements: hand texture classification, aggregate stability test slaking and dispersion results, hydrochloric acid test for calcareous soil, and for a subset of locations Visual Evaluation of Soil Structure (VESS) score 5. Observations (also classified into groups): soil surface condition (e.g. slaked/unslaked/capped/poached etc.), vegetation type Field contextual data include: 1. Land owner/manager responses to a land use and management questionnaire (primary data) including information on: crop types/rotation, cover crops, herbal leys, organic or conventional, organic amendments, lime additions, tillage, last ploughed, tramlines, buffer strips, field drainage, grass species, livestock, last grazed, stocking density, grazing weeks per year, stock out-wintering, mob or paddock grazing, woodland management, tree species, woodland age, path management, land use history, flooding history, waterlogging, water or sediment runoff 2. Classification of selected questionnaire free text responses into categories (derived secondary data) 3. General field observations (primary data) including: slope gradient and shape, surface form, surface water, surface condition (slaking, capped, ruts, wheelings, poaching etc.), soil erosion or deposition features As agreed with the survey participants, this dataset has been anonymised by removing location specific information, such as farm and field names, along with any other personally identifiable information. As also agreed, point data location coordinates have been degraded to the nearest 1 km grid point. The dataset was co-produced by the UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology and Landwise Partners as part of the Landwise Natural Flood Management project, supported by the Natural Environment Research Council (Grant NE/R004668/1). The participation and assistance of the land owners and managers is gratefully acknowledged. Full details about this dataset can be found at https://doi.org/10.5285/9ab5285f-e9c4-4588-ba21-476e79e87668

Resource type

dataset

Resource locator

Unique resource identifier

code

https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/9ab5285f-e9c4-4588-ba21-476e79e87668

codeSpace

doi:

Dataset language

eng

Spatial reference system

code identifying the spatial reference system

Classification of spatial data and services

Topic category

environment

Keywords

Keyword set

keyword value

Soil

Land Use

originating controlled vocabulary

title

GEMET - INSPIRE themes, version 1.0

reference date

date type

publication

effective date

2008-06-01

Keyword set

keyword value

Soil

Physics

Hydrology

Properties

Observations

Vegetation

Land Use

Land Management

Field

Survey

Natural Flood Management

Agriculture

Arable

Grassland

Woodland

Crops

Rotation

Herbal Ley

Tillage

Livestock

Grazing

Tree

Drainage

Waterlogging

Flooding

Bulk Density

Water Content

Soil Moisture

Organic Matter

Porosity

Particle Size

Texture

Aggregate Stability

VESS

Slaking

Surface Condition

Thames

UK

Gloucestershire

Wiltshire

West Berkshire

Oxfordshire

Hampshire

Wokingham

Landwise

Geographic location

West bounding longitude

-2.058

East bounding longitude

-0.809

North bounding latitude

51.935

South bounding latitude

51.204

Temporal reference

Temporal extent

Begin position

2018-01-01

End position

2021-12-31

Dataset reference date

date type

publication

effective date

2022-11-17

Frequency of update

Quality and validity

Lineage

Survey participants (land owners/managers) were self-selecting. Survey areas were identified to fulfil the overall Landwise sampling strategy objective of sampling approximately 8 fields in each of the twenty Landwise land use/management and soil/geology class combinations. Participants completed a land use and management questionnaire for each sampled field/land parcel. At each sampling point within a field, observations of vegetation type and soil surface condition were made. Volumetric soil samples were taken vertically from 0-50 mm below ground level (bgl) using an Eijkelkamp 50 mm internal diameter soil sampling ring. An additional (non-volumetric) soil sample was also taken by trowel. Soil samples were sealed in plastic bags and refrigerated on the day of collection prior to laboratory analysis. A soil sample from 0-50 mm bgl was also hand textured following Natural England (2008) TIN037. For selected sampling points, a Visual Evaluation of Soil Structure (VESS) score was determined. The following laboratory analyses were undertaken. Soil dry bulk density and volumetric water content were determined by oven drying at 105°C for 36 h. Sub-samples from the additional soil samples were used for hand texturing and laser particle size distribution measurement (Malvern MasterSizer 2000). Air-dried sub-samples were used in an aggregate stability slaking and dispersion test. Soil organic matter was determined by loss on ignition in a furnace at 400°C for 16 h. Soil was tested for reaction to hydrochloric acid test to identify calcareous soil. Field and laboratory data record transcriptions were independently verified. Calculated primary data were quality controlled by an independent assessor to flag any potential spurious values, correcting or removing the data as appropriate. Secondary (derived) data were determined from the primary data. Soil porosity was calculated using dry bulk density, typical soil particle density percentage and optionally soil organic matter percentage and typical soil organic matter density. Secondary classifications (class groups) of questionnaire responses were made using spreadsheet filtering tools. Soil texture classes were determined from soil laser particle size distribution data using the R ‘soiltexture’ package (Moeys et al., 2018). Details of the variables (name, units and brief description) may be found in the Supporting Documentation: LANDWISE_BroadScale_Survey_Field_Contextual_Data_PUBLIC_metadata.csv LANDWISE_BroadScale_Survey_Point_Data_PUBLIC_metadata.csv The following data limitations should be noted. Although field observations and measurements were taken following a consistent methodology, the different field teams had varying expertise and experience. A ‘SurveyStaffCode’ has been provided for each data record to reflect this potential variation. Soil organic matter determined by loss on ignition is known to be an estimate. Derived soil porosity accounting for soil organic matter relies on an assumed typical organic matter particle density, which will be somewhat uncertain. Secondary classifications, although independently quality controlled, are an interpretation of free text responses and/or field observations and are therefore somewhat dependent on the data analyst.

Conformity

Conformity report

specification

title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1089/2010 of 23 November 2010 implementing Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards interoperability of spatial data sets and services

reference date

date type

publication

effective date

2010-12-08

degree

explanation

Data format

name of format

Comma-separated values (CSV)

version of format

Constraints related to access and use

Constraint set

Limitations on public access

Constraint set

Limitations on public access

Constraint set

Limitations on public access

If you reuse this data, you should cite: Blake, J., Trill, E., O'Brien, A., Clark, J., Hares, A., Ingham, A., Whitwam, B., Sherlock, E., Clarke, T., Theobald, H., Robotham, J., Verhoef, A., Hammond, J., White, K., Macdonald, D., Short, C., Nisbet, T., Frost, R., Gantlett, R., Gold, J., Willson, B., Old, G., Love, A., McGeehin, P. (2022). Soil near-surface properties, vegetation observations, land use and land management information for 1800 locations across the Thames catchment, UK, 2018-2021. NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre https://doi.org/10.5285/9ab5285f-e9c4-4588-ba21-476e79e87668

Responsible organisations

Responsible party

organisation name

UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology

email address

enquiries@ceh.ac.uk

responsible party role

author

Responsible party

organisation name

UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology

email address

enquiries@ceh.ac.uk

responsible party role

author

Responsible party

organisation name

UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology

email address

enquiries@ceh.ac.uk

responsible party role

author

Responsible party

organisation name

University of Reading

email address

enquiries@ceh.ac.uk

responsible party role

author

Responsible party

organisation name

Wilts Soil and Root Innovators

email address

enquiries@ceh.ac.uk

responsible party role

author

Responsible party

organisation name

Skylark Farm Advice

email address

enquiries@ceh.ac.uk

responsible party role

author

Responsible party

organisation name

Farm and Wildlife Advisory Group SW

email address

enquiries@ceh.ac.uk

responsible party role

author

Responsible party

organisation name

Farm and Wildlife Advisory Group SW

email address

enquiries@ceh.ac.uk

responsible party role

author

Responsible party

organisation name

Farm and Wildlife Advisory Group SE

email address

enquiries@ceh.ac.uk

responsible party role

author

Responsible party

organisation name

HT Farm Consulting

email address

enquiries@ceh.ac.uk

responsible party role

author

Responsible party

organisation name

UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology

email address

enquiries@ceh.ac.uk

responsible party role

author

Responsible party

organisation name

University of Reading

email address

enquiries@ceh.ac.uk

responsible party role

author

Responsible party

organisation name

University of Reading

email address

enquiries@ceh.ac.uk

responsible party role

author

Responsible party

organisation name

University of Reading

email address

enquiries@ceh.ac.uk

responsible party role

author

Responsible party

organisation name

British Geological Survey

email address

enquiries@ceh.ac.uk

responsible party role

author

Responsible party

organisation name

University of Gloucestershire

email address

enquiries@ceh.ac.uk

responsible party role

author

Responsible party

organisation name

Forest Research

email address

enquiries@ceh.ac.uk

responsible party role

author

Responsible party

organisation name

Foundation for Water Research

email address

enquiries@ceh.ac.uk

responsible party role

author

Responsible party

organisation name

Yatesbury House Farm

email address

enquiries@ceh.ac.uk

responsible party role

author

Responsible party

organisation name

Hendred Farm Partnership

email address

enquiries@ceh.ac.uk

responsible party role

author

Responsible party

organisation name

Farm Carbon Cutting Toolkit

email address

enquiries@ceh.ac.uk

responsible party role

author

Responsible party

organisation name

UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology

email address

enquiries@ceh.ac.uk

responsible party role

author

Responsible party

organisation name

Environment Agency

email address

enquiries@ceh.ac.uk

responsible party role

author

Responsible party

organisation name

Pang Valley Flood Forum

email address

enquiries@ceh.ac.uk

responsible party role

author

Responsible party

organisation name

UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology

email address

enquiries@ceh.ac.uk

responsible party role

pointOfContact

Responsible party

organisation name

NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre

email address

enquiries@ceh.ac.uk

responsible party role

custodian

Responsible party

organisation name

NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre

email address

enquiries@ceh.ac.uk

responsible party role

publisher

Responsible party

organisation name

UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology

email address

enquiries@ceh.ac.uk

responsible party role

owner

Metadata on metadata

Metadata point of contact

organisation name

Environmental Information Data Centre

full postal address

Lancaster Environment Centre, Library Avenue, Bailrigg

Lancaster

LA1 4AP

UK

email address

info@eidc.ac.uk

responsible party role

pointOfContact

Metadata date

2023-07-28T14:40:16

Metadata language

eng