b9756c4c-9894-4147-a260-a79067604a06
English
ISO/IEC 8859-1 (also known as Latin 1)
dataset
dataset
Environmental Information Data Centre
Lancaster Environment Centre, Library Avenue, Bailrigg
Lancaster
LA1 4AP
UK
info@eidc.ac.uk
pointOfContact
2022-05-20T10:40:12
UK GEMINI
2.3
WGS 84
Rift Valley fever virus seroprevalence data from cattle, sheep and goats sampled in a cross sectional survey in Tana River County, Kenya (2013)
2017-03-08
publication
2013-06-01
creation
https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/b9756c4c-9894-4147-a260-a79067604a06
10.5285/b9756c4c-9894-4147-a260-a79067604a06
doi:
Bett, B., Lindahl, J.F., Wanyoike, S., Grace, D. (2017). Rift Valley fever virus seroprevalence data from cattle, sheep and goats sampled in a cross sectional survey in Tana River County, Kenya (2013). NERC Environmental Information Data Centre 10.5285/b9756c4c-9894-4147-a260-a79067604a06
These data provide results from serological analysis carried out on serum collected from cattle (sample number = 460), goats (sample number = 949) and sheep (Sample number = 574) combined with data collected at the household and subject/animal levels at the time of serum sampling. The data collected at the household and subject/animal levels were: the total number of livestock owned by a household, altitude, geographical coordinates of the sampling sites; and breed, age, sex and body condition score of an animal. The research was carried out in irrigated and non-irrigated areas in Tana River County, Kenya. Field surveys were implemented in August to November 2013 and laboratory analyses were completed in June 2015. Serum samples were harvested from blood samples obtained from animals and screened for anti-Rift Valley Fever (RVF) virus immunoglobulin G using inhibition (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) ELISA immunoassay. The household data was collected using Open Data Kit (ODK) loaded into smart phones. The serological analysis was performed to determine the risk of Rift Valley Fever virus exposure in cattle, sheep and goats. The aim of the survey was to investigate whether land use change, specifically the conversion of rangeland into cropland, affected RVF exposure pattern in livestock.
The data were collected by experienced researchers from the Ministry of Livestock Development Nairobi, Kenya and the International Livestock Research Institute (Kenya).
This dataset is part of a wider research project, the Dynamic Drivers of Disease in Africa Consortium (DDDAC). The research was funded by NERC project no NE-J001570-1 with support from the Ecosystem Services for Poverty Alleviation Programme (ESPA). Additional funding was provided by Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) Research Program Agriculture for Nutrition and Health led by International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Full details about this dataset can be found at https://doi.org/10.5285/b9756c4c-9894-4147-a260-a79067604a06
Bernard Bett
International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) Kenya
enquiries@ceh.ac.uk
pointOfContact
Bett, B.
International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) Kenya
enquiries@ceh.ac.uk
author
Lindahl, J.F.
International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) Kenya
enquiries@ceh.ac.uk
author
Wanyoike, S.
Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries
enquiries@ceh.ac.uk
author
Grace, D.
International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) Kenya
enquiries@ceh.ac.uk
author
NERC Environmental Information Data Centre
enquiries@ceh.ac.uk
publisher
NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre
enquiries@ceh.ac.uk
custodian
notPlanned
Kenya
GeoNames
2006-01-01
creation
Tana River
Drivers of Disease in Africa Consortium (DDDAC)
Ecosystem Services for Poverty Alleviation (ESPA)
Rift Valley Fever
RVF
seroprevalence
serum
goats
sheep
cattle
otherRestrictions
no limitations
otherRestrictions
This resource is made available under the terms of the Open Government Licence
otherRestrictions
© International Livestock Research Institute (Kenya)
otherRestrictions
If you reuse this data, you should cite: Bett, B., Lindahl, J.F., Wanyoike, S., Grace, D. (2017). Rift Valley fever virus seroprevalence data from cattle, sheep and goats sampled in a cross sectional survey in Tana River County, Kenya (2013). NERC Environmental Information Data Centre https://doi.org/10.5285/b9756c4c-9894-4147-a260-a79067604a06
textTable
English
utf8
health
39.67
40.05
-1.53
-1.06
Comma-separated values (CSV)
NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre
info@eidc.ac.uk
distributor
https://data-package.ceh.ac.uk/data/b9756c4c-9894-4147-a260-a79067604a06
Download the data
Download a copy of this data
download
https://data-package.ceh.ac.uk/sd/b9756c4c-9894-4147-a260-a79067604a06.zip
Supporting information
Supporting information available to assist in re-use of this dataset
information
dataset
dataset
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1089/2010 of 23 November 2010 implementing Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards interoperability of spatial data sets and services
2010-12-08
Households and subsequently livestock within the households were randomly selected and recruited into the study. Household data were collected using a short questionnaire that was administered to the household head or his/her representative. Animal characteristics (e.g. age, sex, species, breed, etc.) were obtained using a checklist at the time of blood sampling. These data was uploaded to a server at the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) at the end of each day. The data were stored in an on-line database as Microsoft Excel files.
Blood samples were collected from recruited animals through jugular venipuncture. Serum samples were prepared in the field and preserved in dry ice until they were transferred into liquid nitrogen tanks on arrival at the research laboratories at ILRI. These samples were screened for anti-(Rift Valley Fever) RVF virus immunoglobulin G using inhibition ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) immunoassay with the results being kept in a database designed in Microsoft Excel. The final dataset was created by merging field and laboratory data and the merged data were converted into a csv file for ingestion.
Records from each of the files have not been transformed or altered in any way.