Identification

Title

1992 - 1996 Centre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science (Cefas) A comparison of benthic biodiversity in the North Sea, English Channel and Celtic Seas. Epifauna trawl sampling 1992-1996

Abstract

<span style="display: inline !important; float: none; background-color: #ffffff; color: #333333; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue',Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: left; text-decoration: none; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px;">...</span> Samples were obtained by MAFF research vessels from 69 stations between 1992-1996. A 2-m Lowestoft beam trawl with a 3 mm cod-end liner was deployed for 5–10 min across each station at a speed of about 0.5 m/s. Data includes information of the species found at each station. The start and end of the haul positions were recorded. Tow length averaged about 400 m, but varied substantially (s.d.=290) depending on tidal current velocity and wind strength at the time of sampling. On retrieval of the trawl, an estimate of sample volume was made, along with a summary of the contents, noting especially the presence of stones, rock, etc. The sample was then sorted on deck over a 5 mm mesh sieve.

Resource type

dataset

Resource locator

http://data.cefas.co.uk/#/View/20628/

function: order

Unique resource identifier

code

CEFAS6be9866e-dc0a-4e57-9f6c-de7bff72793c

codeSpace

http://www.cefas.co.uk/

Dataset language

eng

Spatial reference system

authority code

OGP

code identifying the spatial reference system

urn:ogc:def:crs:EPSG::4326

Additional information source

<span style="display: inline !important; float: none; background-color: #ffffff; color: #555555; font-family: 'Open Sans',sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: left; text-decoration: none; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px;">...</span> <span style="display: inline !important; float: none; background-color: #ffffff; color: #555555; font-family: 'Open Sans',sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: left; text-decoration: none; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px;">...</span>

Classification of spatial data and services

Topic category

biota

Keywords

Keyword set

keyword value

Keyword set

keyword value

originating controlled vocabulary

title

reference date

date type

revision

effective date

2011-03-25

Keyword set

keyword value

originating controlled vocabulary

title

reference date

date type

publication

effective date

2008-06-01

Keyword set

keyword value

originating controlled vocabulary

title

reference date

date type

publication

effective date

2008-06-01

Geographic location

West bounding longitude

-8

East bounding longitude

4

North bounding latitude

58.5

South bounding latitude

49

Extent

Extent group

authority code

title

reference date

date type

revision

effective date

2010-05-18

code identifying the extent

Extent group

authority code

title

reference date

date type

revision

effective date

2010-05-18

code identifying the extent

Extent group

authority code

title

reference date

date type

revision

effective date

2010-05-18

code identifying the extent

Temporal reference

Temporal extent

Begin position

1992-05-11T23:00:00.000Z

End position

1996-07-08T23:00:00.000Z

Dataset reference date

date type

publication

effective date

2020-08-11

Frequency of update

notPlanned

Quality and validity

Lineage

Most specimens were identified and enumerated at sea. Any problematic specimens were preserved in formalin for identification on land. The presence of infaunal organisms arising from the fouling of soft sediments, and pelagic species such as jellyfish were noted. However, these records were excluded from the final compilation of the data. Motile taxa not dealt with at sea were identified to species level, as far as possible, using a range of standard taxonomic keys. Nomenclature followed that of Howson (1987). A ranked descriptor of the predominant substratum type along trawl tows was derived from a combination of records of trawl contents, particle size analyses of sediments from grabs where available, and information from Admiralty Charts.

Conformity

Data format

name of format

version of format

Constraints related to access and use

Constraint set

Use constraints

Public data (Crown Copyright) - Open Government Licence Terms and Conditions apply

Constraint set

Limitations on public access

Public data (Crown Copyright) - Open Government Licence Terms and Conditions apply

Responsible organisations

Responsible party

contact position

Data Manager

organisation name

Centre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science

full postal address

Cefas Lowestoft Laboratory

Pakefield Road

Lowestoft

NR33 0HT

UK

telephone number

+44 (0)1502 562244

email address

data.manager@cefas.co.uk

responsible party role

originator

Responsible party

contact position

Data Manager

organisation name

Centre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science

full postal address

Cefas Lowestoft Laboratory

Pakefield Road

Lowestoft

NR33 0HT

UK

telephone number

+44 (0)1502 562244

email address

data.manager@cefas.co.uk

responsible party role

custodian

Metadata on metadata

Metadata point of contact

contact position

Data Manager

organisation name

Centre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science

full postal address

Cefas Lowestoft Laboratory

Pakefield Road

Lowestoft

NR33 0HT

UK

telephone number

+44 (0)1502 562244

email address

data.manager@cefas.co.uk

responsible party role

pointOfContact

Metadata date

2020-08-11T13:33:46

Metadata language