| CIM001 |
1 |
Serious noncompliance |
Track record of poor compliance. |
Little or no technical knowledge.
No appreciation of hazards/no quality control.
No staff training/supervision.
Evidence of previous formal enforcement action.
Disproportionate number of justified complaints since last inspection.
Unwillingness to act on advice or enforcement action.
Unreactive approach to dealing with any non-compliance, resulting in immediate risk to consumers or could give rise to potentially fraudulent actions/activities. |
FoodStandards |
|
08/06/2023 |
|
|
| CIM002 |
2 |
Significant noncompliance |
Track record of varying compliance |
Staff training/supervision is inadequate.
Poor understanding of relevant food law and control necessary controls.
Significant number of justified complaints.
Reluctance to engage and slow to respond and rectify any non-compliance in a timely manner resulting in the potential for consumers to be mis informed. |
FoodStandards |
|
08/06/2023 |
|
|
| CIM003 |
3 |
Broad compliance,
with only minor
non-compliance |
Satisfactory record compliance with history of minor non-compliance only |
Staff can demonstrate a basic understanding of all relevant food law.
Some complaints but not excessive.
Good attitude to Food Standards compliance but struggling to implement them and relying on LA support. |
FoodStandards |
|
08/06/2023 |
|
|
| CIM004 |
4 |
Good compliance |
Staff can demonstrate good awareness of food law and necessary controls. |
Good track record.
Minor complaints.
Fully engaged.
Good attitude to FS Compliance. |
FoodStandards |
|
08/06/2023 |
|
|
